FUELLESS HEATER NO FUEL NO GAS NO WOOD NO GREEN HOUSE GASES
from the webmaster Although the device is efficient, in most all water heating applications it is difficult to economically justify a device. The company has moved towards the mixing and reaction chemistry applications and specialized heating applications. The system can heat water, but there are numerous competing technologies that can heat water and make steam that are much less capital intensive and often cheaper to operate, as electricity is an expensive and highly refined fuel when compared to gas, coal or oil. Because of this we ceased marketing home/residential heating systems and generic steam systems. Our core heating applications are now applications where: A fluid scales rapidly on a heat transfer surface Safety/operational concerns demand a flameless system for safety Total automation is needed and not available with conventional technology Our heating applications are largely niche applications where conventional technology falls short. Examples of heating applications well suited to the device include: Heating of food products such as cheese, eggs and chocolate Heating chemical and polymeric streams Heating industrial brines and heavy salt solutions Our company continues to strive to bring our customers the best industrial heating, mixing and reactor solutions. PRODUCT REVIEW HYDRODYNAMICS.com or www.totalsep.com
No related posts.
i love how in one conversation a person can go from how overunity is suppressed by “Big Oil” and in the same sentence that Global Warming is a conspiracy too. Guess what? Who do you think started global warming denial? it was “Big Oil” you idiots! Get on the side of the planet.
If thats the case then is it fair to say that the additional energy isnt being measured at the point of input…. because its litterally stored as potential energy in the vacuum? Then would be also fair to say that the input energy is being lost in the system, obeying the laws of COE, but the output energy being measured is actually the output energy of an enitrely different system…..hence it appearing as the engine is creating over unity??
seemingly using water as fuel,over unity generators
@tinytest Take a plant and choke it with Co2, I mean completely saturate it’s enviroment with Co2. Make sure it has enough sunlight and water etc, but CHOKE it with Co2 and see what happens.
Yes, there is a threshold. 1 plant can handle only SO much Co2. The rest is simple math. The less plants (which is happening) with more Co2 means the eco-system can’t cope.
If you still don’t understand, look at it this way. YOU can die of too much oxygen…
So co2 levels, as for actual numbers don’t matter???
@JRBeaman correct, but a lot of people use the term over-unity incorrectly. This is just efficient use of energy already there. If you consider the amount of sunlight that hits a square meter of ground can power an entire city, yet we can only harness something ridiculous like 0.05% of that through solar panels, we have a very long (or short?) way to go to increase our efficiency in capturing these naturally abundant resources for our use. Factor in greed, and I’ll agree with you & sc00f 100%
@tinytest lol, wondering when the conspiracy theorist in you would come to light.I just work on facts,and fact is: Plants are diminishing and Co2 levels are not (in fact, opposite) so the balance in that entire eco-system is off. Personally I don’t think we’re headed (or the creators of) “global warming”, but I do think that the Earth is a self-correcting organism, and if it gets too hot, it will cool itself down, thus I foresee another ice age before any global warming… balance to all in life
How much co2 is too much? What is the % of co2 in the air? How much is mans addition? I like to conserve & use resourses wisely, However if you look at the #s, you will realise this co2 game is just a power grab, for big govenment, and they are training young pawns to help build their position.
@tinytest That’s just the thing, with the decline of rain forests and plant life on earth, making way for “development”, and the increase of Co2, it means that there’s an imbalance.1 plant can only do SO much with Co2 before being overwhelmed.Same applies with your body. Food = Energy correct? So Food = Good?So more food = more energy?No. Guess that’s why we have so many fat people these days dying because their motors (hearts) can’t keep up with the massive amount of energy they’re taking in
@AcidRaZor We need more co2. What do you think makes the plants grow??
@sc00f: almost all “overunity” inventions are scams to get funding. The rest are laughed at due to poor science in the claims.
Over unity is the results of false measurements, and/or calculations, or bad assumptions.
Kool way of heating water tho.
Answer: because of the oil & energy maffia. They repeatedly supress overunity inventions, because it would threat their multi-trillion dollar business. Quite a few inventors had been silenced in the past 100 years. One of the first was Tesla, who had a car which ran without fuel… Do your research.
Once the heavy rotor gets up to speed it has a good bit of inertia. That’s the first thing that comes to mind where the over-unity problem may have come into play.
science -_-
@AndrewSummers I don’t think this implementation would work for power stations, however, business & homes using a geyser for hot water would benefit off of this device much more in terms of energy efficiency. The less load on the grid we can put by using energy efficiently means less Co2 to produce the equivalent to what is needed just to heat up some water for your shower
@nickdwolff I think the hype words used “100% more efficient” etc detracts from the point these guys really would like to make and that is that they can produce hot, usable water (or steam) with minimal electricity input. A geyser for instance, works based on an element heating the water and keeping it heated throughout the day (depending on your water usage and loss of heat) which is takes quite a lot of energy to maintain.Compared with this, where you have hot water in seconds off of min input
also, this idea of using cavitation to produce heat isn’t new. But it still is interesting. What do you plan to use the steam for, please don’t say to produce electricity.
you do realize that when calculating the efficiency of this device you have to take into consideration the energy lost to the pump that pushes the water through the device, not just the electrical motor going into turning the disk. Even if your system had no friction, which it clearly has to, you would still have entropy generation and hence energy lost, giving you an efficiency less than 100%. You should have your system analysed by a professional and not just assume you know whats going on.
so if they have 170% efficiency then why isnt this in every power station in the world?
not true thats why
@dalongrun nothing wrong with trying to disprove science. after all thats what makes science great.
Ah okay…
They found a perpetuum mobile?
Suuuuuuure xD
Not possible, however it’s quite an interesting idea, if it’s more effective for warming water fast, it can be used in professional cooking
and more than that
bull shit
@ greenlivingitup . com it shows how to build a free energy device with magnets
even the richest soil, if left uncultivated will produce the rankest weeds